Treasures of the Monterey Bay
is the curriculum design project created by Brenda Lewis for ED 665. The
following peer assessment is based on the work of Wiggins and
McTighe.Comments:
This is a very worthwhile project and the central activity of the
project around which all of the other activities pivot is the trip to the
Monterey Bay Aquarium. Students will love that, but the challenge is tying it
back to real learning. The project consultants (fourth graders—all teachers
should use such consultants!) noted that their trip to the aquarium in another
class was fun, but that it didn't seem to be tied together to help them learn.
This project does provide much more focus although the activities listed don't
necessarily fulfill the full promise of the project.
With the current learning experiences, it
isn't obvious how the learning experiences would aid the targeted
understandings. As an example, the six facets of understanding cover big ideas (e.g., "...understand
that life under the waters of the Bay contributes to the well-being of the life
on the land around it"), but those big ideas are not directly addressed in the
learning experiences or other materials. It's not obvious how drawing and coloring the
marine animal leads to that big idea or how creating a report, even in a
teams, aids understanding that connection.
"Reflect and rethink" has open
discussion and collaboration given as part of the lesson. Collaboration is seen
with the students working in groups, as shown by the treasure map. Open
discussion can be inferred from the students giving their reports but it would
help an inexperienced teacher more if it were directly addressed in the
activities. The treasure map sheet does give activities, but it
doesn't have revision and feedback built into it.
Giving more learning activities at the bottom of the design page that tie
back to big ideas would make the connections more obvious. For example, the
students could revise their reports based on feedback from the teacher and other
students. When drawing a picture, they might have a focus on how the animals
move or the different ways the animals move, hypothesize why that method is
suitable for the habitat, then verify their hypothesis. In their reports, it
would help if there were activity that would pull together the concept of
different habitats in the bay. One possibility might be that each picture the
students draw could be placed at the correct "depth" on a wall with the ceiling
being the surface of the water.
This project has plenty of promise and minor revision would help it fulfill
that promise.
Identify
Desired Results
To what
extent are the targeted understandings
-
Big ideas
(as opposed to basic facts and skills) in need of uncoverage? extensively
-
Specific
enough to guide teaching and assessing? somewhat
-
Framed by
provocative essential and unit questions? somewhat
Determine
Acceptable Evidence
To
what extent does the assessment evidence provide
-
A valid
and reliable measure of the targeted understandings? somewhat
-
Sufficient
info to support inferences about each student's understanding? somewhat
-
Opportunities
for students to exhibit their understandings through authentic performance
tasks? somewhat
Plan
Learning Experiences and Instruction
To what
extent will
-
Students
know where their going and why (in terms of unit goals, performance
requirements, and evaluative criteria)? somewhat
-
Students
be engaged in digging into the big ideas of the unit (through inquiry,
research, problem-solving, and experimentation)? somewhat
-
Students
receive explicit instruction on the knowledge and skills needed to equip
them for the required performance? somewhat
-
Students
have opportunities to rehearse, revise, and refine their work based on
feedback? somewhat
-
Students
self-assess and set goals prior to the conclusion of the unit? somewhat
Criteria from Understanding by Design, Wiggins, Grant and J. McTighe, 1998,
p. 187
Alexandria, Virginia, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
Last maintained
08/23/2003
|